The Roman Lutheran Circus

Friday, January 28, 2022

Are You Getting It Yet?

By Lúcío Mascarenhas

January 28, 2022.

https://www.vaticaninexile.com

REFERENCES:

1. https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/vatican-city-support-your-children-if-they-are-gay-pope-francis-tells-parents-2731103/amp/1

2. https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/pope-francis-says-parents-should-support-gay-children-not-condemn-them

3. https://abcnews.go.com/amp/International/wireStory/pope-urges-parents-accompany-condemn-gay-children-82485073

4. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/pope-francis-support-children-gay-b2001734.html

Introducing, Yet Again His Filthiness, Pachapapa, Vicar of Satan, Antichrist and Antipope, and his 'god of surprises,' who violently hates Catholicism but equally passionately loves Sodomy, Homosexuality, no surprises here.

The Patriarch of Sodom, His Filthiness, Antipope Jorge Pachapapa Borgoglu, bleeds for his beloved fellow-homosexuals, his fellow-Sodomites, his fellow-Catamites. His Satanic Sect, the Anticatholic Church "teaches that homosexuals should be treated with respect and that, while homosexual acts are sinful, homosexual tendencies are not. Parents of homosexuals should not condemn them but offer them support. Homosexuals have a 'right' to be accepted by their families as children and siblings." The Anticatholic Church "supports 'civil union laws' aimed at giving homosexual 'partners' joint rights in areas of pensions, health care, inheritance, etc."

Isn't that Wonderful?

Lets put that in Perspective:

«The Anticatholic Church "teaches that Sodomites, Rapists, Pedophiles, Cannibals, Bestialists, etc should be treated with respect and that, while their acts are sinful, their tendencies are not. Their parents should not condemn them but offer them support. Sodomites, Rapists, Pedophiles, Cannibals, Bestialists, etc have a 'right' to be accepted by their families as children and siblings." Sodomites, Rapists, Pedophiles, Cannibals, Bestialists, etc have a 'right' to be accepted by Society and by Governments and States. The Anticatholic Church "supports 'laws' aimed at enabling, normalizing, enfranchising Sodomites, Rapists, Pedophiles, Cannibals, Bestialists, etc in areas of pensions, health care, inheritance, etc."»

There, I fixed the lacunae, inadequacies, in the Infinite Lovingness of the Patriarch of Sodom, His Filthiness, Antipope Jorge Pachapapa Borgoglu.

Yet, I am far from being done with His Luciferianness. Antipope Lucifer VI tells families that they must be open, nonjudgmental, not condemnatory, etc.of his fellow Homosexuals, his fellow Sodomites, his fellow-Catamites. Yet, the same Vermin reacts with Infinite Hatred of, judgmentality, condemnation, etc of dupes who try to 'retain a sense or modicum of Catholicism'!

"Never condemn your children," says Poop 'Francis,' "unless, of course, they have tendencies towards Catholicism. Then they must be slandered, libelled as 'alleged Pelagians, Rigidists, Clericalists, etc.'"

Says Poop 'Francis,' "Who am I NOT to falsely judge, slander, libel, calumniate pro-Catholics, crypto-Catholics, etc as alleged Pelagians, Rigidists, Clericalists, etc.?"

COULD THIS BE POSSIBLE

Can we really expect the AntiCatholic Sect and its Antipope Al Borgoglu to have the courage to say this? «Our Sect "teaches that pro-Catholics, crypto-Catholics, etc should be treated with respect, not slander, libel them, as does 'Poop Francis,' as alleged Pelagians, Rigidists, Clericalists, etc. Their parents should not condemn them, as does 'Poop Francis' as alleged Pelagians, Rigidists, Clericalists, etc. but offer them support. Pro-Catholics, crypto-Catholics, etc have a 'right' to be accepted by their families as children and siblings," and not to be falsely condemned, as does 'Poop Francis,' as alleged Pelagians, Rigidists, Clericalists, etc. Pro-Catholics, crypto-Catholics, etc have a 'right' to be accepted by Society, Civil Society, and by Governments and States. Our Sect "supports 'laws' aimed at enabling, normalizing, enfranchising pro-Catholics, crypto-Catholics, etc in areas of marriages, pensions, health care, inheritance, etc."»

PERISH THE THOUGHT!!!

Says Poop 'Francis,' "Who am I NOT to falsely judge, slander, libel, calumniate pro-Catholics, crypto-Catholics, etc as alleged Pelagians, Rigidists, Clericalists, etc.?"

The Catholic God, God of the Bible, Assures, Guarantees, Eternal Damnation to All Who Adhere to this Demonic Sect.

#NoSalvationOutsideTheCatholicChurch https://www.vaticaninexile.com #ReturnToCatholicism or #RoastInPerpetuity.

Lúcío Mascarenhas

January 28, 2022.

https://www.vaticaninexile.com

Friday, December 31, 2021

KJV - The Devil's Bible

On Who's Authority is Your Bible Version Certified?

By Lucio Mascarenhas, May 13 2013

Jesus Christ did not entrust His authority to anybody and everybody, but He carefully selected and nurtured a band of men and entrusted His authority to them, firstly to Simon BarJona, then to the twelve Apostles, and then to the seventy-two disciples, all of whom had authority over the rest of the believers, thus forming a hierarchy. It is important to note that Jesus Christ did not entrust His authority to kings and civil rulers. In the Old Testament, God, who is Jesus Christ, made it very particular that His kings did not have the same authority and standing as His priests had, and could not exercise ecclesiastical authority. God punished one of His kings (Ozias, 2 Paralipomenon (2 Chronicles), Chapter 26, http://drbo.org/chapter/14026.htm) for offering sacrifice, which was the prerogative of His priests. Nothing has changed with the Incarnation of Jesus Christ, what was true before, remains true afterwards. Jesus Christ taught, "Render to Caesar that what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's." The Church belongs to God, not to Caesar.

Kings and secular rulers have, and can have, no authority whatsoever over the Church. They do not have the authority to certify which version of the Bible is Godly and which is not. Only the Priesthood created by Jesus Christ, the Most High Priest, has that authority from Him.

Any king or secular ruler that claims to have authority over the Church is a worker of Satan, an Antichrist, an abomination and an anathema for the true and faithful Christian.

English Protestant Bible versions are either versions "authorized" by schismatic, apostate Kings of England and Scotland or are derived from them. The foremost of these is the "King James Version." Any truly believing Christian knows the KJV as Satan's Own Version.

All Protestant English bible versions available today are derived from the KJV. Each of them go back for their "authority" to the KJV, which goes back to "King" James I Stuart, a traitor, an apostate, heretic and schismatic, in sum, a Satanist. A man who usurped to himself the authority that Jesus Christ exclusively devolved upon His Priesthood.

Every Protestant bible is an abomination, an oracle, not of God, but of Satan. Each of them are filthy and nauseous, an abomination of abominations, portals to eternal damnation. No believing Christian must touch them even with a barge pole. They are passports to Hell, passports to Eternal Damnation.

Lucio Mascarenhas, May 13, 2013

On 21-Jul-2009 2:16 PM, "Lucio Mascarenhas" <lu******as@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Bonnie,

I have read with interest your request for the Authorized Version (AV) or the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible. I would like to take this opportunity to suggest that you go in instead for the Catholic Douai-Rheims or the Challoner Versions.

The Challoner version is easily available, and is online at several websites. Try DRBO.org (It says 'Douai-Rheims,' but it is actually Douai-Rheims-Challoner Version)

You can also download the Douai-Rheims-Challoner at http://www.gutenberg.org.

God set up His Church under Peter, and not under Caesar or Herod, who were Kings.

But Kings have always rebelled against God and have sought to set themselves up fraudulently in opposition to His Church.

Such was Henry VIII, Edward, Elizabeth (who was an illegitimate child), James I Stuart who was an apostate, a renegade, a reprobate and a criminal.

It is James I who is the person behind the KJV, for whom it is named.

His son, another heretic, Charles I, was murdered by ultra-Protestants under Oliver Cromwell because he was not Protestant enough.

His grandsons, Charles II & James II, greatgrandson James III, greatgreatgrandsons Charles III & Henry IX Cardinal Stuart were all Catholics.

The House of Stuart is the successor line or cadet line of the House of Alpin (the MacAlpins), one of the longest ruling houses of Christendom, the Kings of Scotland for nearly a thousand years.

The Stuart Dynasty mainline died out with King Henry IX Cardinal Stuart, but he passed on the line of succession to other relatives, and the last true or Catholic King of England, Scotland, Ireland, etc., was Francis II of Stuart-Wittelsbach, who is a 76-year-old bachelor, while his 72-year-old brother Max-Emmanuel was Prince of Wales, the Crown Prince.

The mainline is however also succeeded by the second line the Dukes of Berwick, of the House of Fitz-James, who have lived in Spain for the last 250 years, and the Ducs de Fitz-James in France.

Regards,

Lúcio Mascarenhas

Have a Cracker?

The "Charismatic Renewal" is Protestant, Not Christian

Lucio Mascarenhas

The "Charismatic Renewal" is a movement that was started by Heretics who denied that the Holy Ghost / Holy Spirit remained, as Jesus Christ promised, for all times with His Church, but taught instead that the Catholic Church "deviated" from the Gospel of Jesus Christ in the alleged "Constantinian Shift" and thus the Holy Ghost / Holy Spirit was "lost" until they, by their "Prayers and Actions," "procured" the "Return of the Holy Ghost / Holy Spirit," which movement developed in historical stages called Irvingism, Latter Rain, Pentecostalism and finally as the "Charismatic Renewal," a movement which is present in many Sects at the same time so that there is a "Catholic" Charismatic Renewal, an Anglican one, a Methodist one, a Baptist one, a Lutheran one, etc.

This teaching flatly Contradicts what Jesus Christ taught, that the Holy Ghost He was sending, would be with His Church until the End Times.

Given this truth, it is obvious that the Charismatic Renewal does not Represent God the Holy Ghost / the Holy Spirit but another Spirit, who, given orthodox Catholic theology, cannot be anyone other than Satan himself.

I mention this because you have quoted to me a "priest" of the "Logos Centre," Bangalore, who is part of the "Catholic Charismatic Renewal," as "celebrating Holy Mass" with "Healing," etc. https://youtu.be/d2aaJH-xnUc and https://www.frjosevettiyankal.org/post/the-charism-of-word-of-knowledge.

This, Logos Centre, and the Charismatic Renewal, is Satan's Work. It is Blasphemy Against God The Holy Ghost to say that that what is clearly and obviously the Work of Satan, the Deceiver, who masquerades as an Angel of Light, and indeed who masquerades as God Himself, is the Work of God!

Such is, as you know, an "Unforgivable Sin"!

It is true that, given these Truths, the Excatholic Church of Roman Protestantism pretends that the "Catholic Charismatic Renewal" is not an import from Heretics but that it began as a result of "Catholics" praying for a "New Pentecost" as "requested" by "Pope St John XXIII," the Satanist Antipope & Heresiarch Roncalli. That this is very obviously a lie is very easily proven.

The "Catholic Charismatic Renewal" includes the "Potta chain of Ashrams," including its Bombay franchise "Tabor Ashram" near Kalyan / Calian. They worship Satan.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charismatic_movement

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_charismatic_renewal

«In search of a spiritual experience, the graduate student Ralph Keifer and history professor William Storey, both of the Catholic Duquesne University in Pittsburgh, attended a meeting of the Cursillo movement in August 1966. They were introduced to two books, The Cross and the Switchblade and They Speak with Other Tongues, which emphasized the Holy Spirit and the Spirit's charisms. In February 1967, Storey and Keifer attended an Episcopalian (Protestant) prayer meeting and were baptized in the Holy Spirit. The following week, Keifer laid hands on other Duquesne professors, and they also had an experience with the Spirit. Then, in February, during a gathering of Duquesne University students at The Ark and The Dove Retreat Center north of Pittsburgh, more people asked Keifer to pray over them. This led to the event at the chapel where they too received the Holy Spirit and spoke in tongues, as well as many other students who were present in the chapel. Keifer sent the news of this event to the University of Notre Dame, where a similar event later occurred, and the Renewal began to spread.»

So the "Holy Spirit" was imported from Heretics and Schismatics!

What Wikipedia omits is that Keifer et al were "prayed over" by a Protestant "woman priest" and that this is where the "Catholic Charismatic Renewal" began!

But the Bible says that Women are not allowed to lead Church services, to be priests!

Only Heretics have "women priests"!

What does that tell you?

The Word of God: "Doth a fountain send forth, out of the same hole, sweet and bitter water?" James iii, 11

Read this carefully. It shows beyond any doubt that the "Catholic Charismatic Renewal" is an import from Protestantism: https://breadoflifebangalore.com/charismatic-renewal

Friday, February 27, 2015

The Truth on 'Mother Teresa'

By L甐 Mascarenhas , Feb 27, 2015.

PageURL: http://romancircus.blogspot.com/2015/02/the-truth-on-mother-teresa.html.

See also: http://goanpatriot.blogspot.com/2005/04/rocket-science-for-soul.html Recently, in February 2015, Mohan Bhagwat (http://twitter.com/DrMohanBhagwat), Chieftain of the Hindu terrorist RSS (National Volunteer Corps) formed & patterned on Hitler & Mussolini's ideas, part of the larger Hindu terrorist Sangh Parivar, which includes India's present governing political arm BJP (Indian People's Party), attacked the late Mother Teresa and her work as designed solely to obtain conversion to Christianity. These remarks provoked a controversy that is ongoing as of this moment, between defenders of Bhagwat & Mother Teresa.

In this 'discourse,' or controversy, however, there's another line, which I, among others, articulate:

The Holy Bible is God's Word. In it God repeatedly insists that He alone is the True God, all other 'gods' are frauds, devils. This is the most fundamental truth of Christianity. Anyone, absolutely anyone, who denies this, who adulterates this, is a Satanist, unequivocally, and if such a person dies persistently holding these errors, such a one will assuredly be damned for eternity to hell.

"I am the Lord your God. You shall know no other god besides me!" - 1st Commandment.

"The gods of the pagans are devils" Psalm 95: 5 (Septuagint)

"He that sacrifices to other gods other than the Lord shall be put to death" - Exodus 22:19

"Never mention the name of any other god; it shall not be heard from your lip" - Exodus 23:13

"What then? Do I say, that what is offered in sacrifice to idols, is any thing? Or, that the idol is any thing? But the things which the heathens sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God. And I would not that you should be made partakers with devils. You cannot drink the chalice of the Lord, and the chalice of devils: you cannot be partakers of the table of the Lord, and of the table of devils. Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? Are we stronger than he?" - 1 Corinthians 10: 19-22

St. Augustine of Hippo, Exposition on Psalm 95, 5-6: "All nations then had devils for their gods: those whom they called gods, were devils, as the Apostle more openly saith, 'The things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice unto devils, and not to God.' ...For when he had said, 'He is more to be feared than all gods:' he added, 'As for all the gods of the heathen, they are devils.'"

Gerhohus of Reichersberg, Exposition on Psalm 95, in Migne, Patrologiae Latin?, Vol. 194, cols. 581-682: "Because all the gods of the Gentiles are demons, that is, they are not gods but demons. When, in fact, idols give answer, the devil himself is speaking in them. These are destructive superstitions, uttering vileness."

St. Thomas of Aquinas, Summa Theologica, II-II, Q. xciv, a. 4:93 The consummative cause of idolatry was the influence of the demons who offered themselves to the worship of erring men, giving answers from idols or doing things which to men seemed marvelous, whence the Psalmist says (Psalm 95:5) 'All the gods of the gentiles are devils.'"

Council of Florence, under Pope Eugenius IV, after St. Fulgencius of Ruspa, disciple of St. Augustine of Hippo: "The Holy, Roman Church... firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will 'go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels', unless they are joined to the Catholic Church before the end of their lives; that the unity of the ecclesiastical body is of such importance that only for those who abide in it do the Church's sacraments contribute to salvation and do fasts, almsgiving and other works of piety and practices of the christian militia produce eternal rewards; and that nobody can be saved, no matter how much he has given away in alms and even if he has shed his blood in the name of Christ, unless he has persevered in the bosom and the unity of the Catholic Church."

St. Francis Xavier: "All the prayers (invocations) of the pagans are hateful to God because all their gods are devils."

"The Catholic religion… is alone the true religion" — Pope Leo XIII, (1890)

"The Catholic Church is alone in keeping the true worship" — Pope Pius XI, (1928)

"Have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them" (Ephesians v, 11) It is a fact, as I have witnessed in my older posts on this subject reproduced below, that Mother Teresa was a adherent of the Apostate Liberal Protestant heresy of Lutheran Modernism, developed from Lutheran Liberalism, that was formally adopted by the Vatican II Council as the formal ideology of the sect it thereby de facto founded in opposition to the orthodox Catholic faith and Church which it supplanted, and whose buildings and name it falsely usurps.

This Modernism, Roman Lutheran Protestantism, formally teaches that the Deicide Jews, Hindus, Muslims, and other Pagans, 'worship the true God,' and can thereby obtain salvation. This fundamentally attacks and denies the above fundamental truth of Christian exclusivity shared by the disparate orthodox Catholic Church & the Evangelical & Fundamentalist Protestants sects although by these only in a distorted manner.

The following Feeneyite-Dimondite sect website page provides conclusive evidence that Mother Teresa was no Catholic, but was a Vicious Satanist: OneTrueCatholicFaith.com/MotherTeresa'sAntichristWorks.

The following Plinian sect website pages also provide perspective:
http://traditioninaction.org/bkreviews/A_025br_MotherTeresa_Zima.htm
http://traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/a013htMotherTeresa.htm
http://traditioninaction.org/Questions/B218_MotherTeresa-Letter.html

Modernism, a Lutheran intellectual disease, that teaches that all belief systems (e.g. Catholicism, Deicide Jewry, Islam, Hinduism, etc.) are evidence of a collective human evolution towards a future One World Religion & all equally valid, infected Catholicism in the decades before the French Revolution, was repressed by Pope Pius IX, clinically diagnosized & excommunicated by Pope St Pius X 1903-1914, manifested itself in the 'Holy Week liturgical reforms' 1955, then seized the Vatican 1958 under the publicly Modernist Antipope John XXIII-II, & formally adopted as official ideology as enacted by the Modernist Robber-Council Vatican II 1962-1965. Until then, until Vatican II, people, and more particularly those in any position of authority, e.g., 'Mother Teresa', were bound by Pope St Pius X's Oath Against Modernism.

Pro-Teresan page that proves from her own words that 'Mother Teresa' was a Modernist heretic & apostate, falling under the Excommunication of Modernist Apostates by Pope St Pius X: http://geocities.ws/lauho08/mother_teresa_on_christianity_and_other_religions.html

From my older articles reproduced below, 'Mother Teresa' expressed her anti-Catholic, Modernist ideas in letters to a Jesuit (!) priest Fr. Franjo Jambrekovic, SJ Feb 8 1937, & to an (!) Archbishop F. Perier, Dec 15, 1955: this shows that the woman hadn't come to SouthAsia a Catholic & then got corrupted by the Vatican II Revolution; on the contrary, she came to SouthAsia already a Modernist, as a Missionary for Modernism, not as a Missionary for Catholicism; if the priest & archbishop didn't report her apostate Modernist nonsense & initiate disciplinary proceedings against her in 1937 & 1955, it is evidence that they too were like her Modernist apostates, also evidence of how far & deep the rot of Modernism had spread even long before Vatican 2!

Jesus Christ taught: "The Kingdom of Satan is not divided against itself." ISIS / Da'esh seems to be at war with the Anti-Christian West, & vice versa; Russia seems to be at war with the West & vice versa; the Zionist Kleptocracy in the Holy Land seems to be at war with Islam & the Liberal West; the Sangh Parivar seems to be at war with the Vatican II Apostate Pseudo-Catholic Church, and so on & on. Yet these are all #PageantWars, charades, false conflicts designed to deceive souls into taking sides, becoming distracted enough not to pay attention to God's Graces, and to ambush souls into the maws of Satan and of hell. Satan is not at war against himself. This was true also of conflicts in the last few centuries: England vs Revolutionary & Napoleonic France; the Allies vs Axis; the Cold War between West & the Communist East, etc. FootSoldiers may be deluded, and fight herculean wars on the ground, but at the very top, the leaders know that they are united in service of Satan through the Deicide Jews.... (Hitler was a Jew, acting out a Jewish agenda to kill millions of Jews so that the Jews could claim that their 'Holocaust' is the true Holocaust vs the Passion of Jesus Christ, and demand and obtain worship of themselves by the world as the Collective-Moschiah, the Official State-Cult of 'Antirevisionism' of the West.)

To Summarize:

Q.: So, did 'Mother Teresa' seek to convert?
A.: Yes, definitely, she actively worked to convert: Like the Modernist Antipope John XXIII-II Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli, who sacrificed his life, refusing to be treated & cured so that, at a crucial time, the fight to destroy the Catholic faith & promulgate Lutheran Modernism in its stead should be carried forwards, likewise 'Mother Teresa' relentlessly spent her life, her strengths, her God-given talents to spread the Gospel of Satanism - the teaching that all 'gods' are true, all religions true, all souls will be saved....

And so, yes, she worked to convert souls, to propagate her ideology, not Catholicism, but Lutheran Liberal Protestant Modernism!

Q.: Where is 'Mother Teresa now?
A.: The Roman Lutheran Protestant sect claims to have 'canonized' her as a Saint in heaven. Jesus taught, "You will know a tree by its fruit," What fruits has the Apostate Satanism brought? Could it be pleasing to God in any manner? This woman lived a public & manifest apostate, and died in it. Could she have gotten into heaven? Only if Satan is God, and God Himself impotent.... Which is impossible! Jesus taught of Judas Iscariot that it were better that he had not been born. So it is with this Demon-woman. And so, just as we know with certainty from the words of Our Lord Himself, that Judas Iscariot is eternally damned, so we know that Antipopes John XXIII-II, Paul 666, John-Paul 1 & 2, Mother Teresa, Jose Escriva, etc., are certainly damned for all eternity in hellfire, where their 'worm dieth not.' For we know this absolutely from the Living God, who is Truth! More info on the Vicious Satanist, apostate, Liberal Lutheran Protestant ideology of Vatican II, Antipope John-Paul 2, Mother Teresa, can be found at:

Official website of the Catholic Pope H.H. Michael 1 in exile:
http://VaticanInExile.com

And also at:
http://www.novusordowatch.org
http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com
http://www.cmri.org
http://www.einsicht-online.de
http://www.huttongibson.com

Rgds

L甐 Mascarenhas
http://twitter.com/IchBinKreuzNet

Heresies of "Mother Teresa"

Posted by Lucio Mascarenhas, Dec 11, 2011
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/goancenter/conversations/topics/1566

"India's souls are beautiful and precious because the Blood of Christ has bedewed them" - GAB / Mother Teresa letter to Fr. Franjo Jambrekovic, SJ Feb 8 1937 (pg 21, "Mother Teresa" by Brian Kolodiejchuk; Gonxhiu Agnes Bojaxhiu aka "Mother Teresa")

The souls of pagans and infidels are beloved to God because He has created them and has created them destined to join Him and share with His Joy for eternity — if they will, and He allows every soul full freedom to choose whether they will conform to Him or not, and as a result, they will either merit Heaven or Hell. But the souls of pagans and infidels are NOT "bedewed" by the "Blood of Jesus Christ"! To affirm that is the grossest heresy! - Lucio Mascarenhas

"Jesus is God therefore His Love, His Thirst is infinite. Our aim is to... quench the thirsting God" - GAB / Mother Teresa Undated emplanation of the Original Constitution of the MCs (pg 61, "Mother Teresa" by Brian Kolodiejchuk; Gonxhiu Agnes Bojaxhiu aka "Mother Teresa")

"The Missionaries of Charity begin... in the depths of God's infinite longing to love and to be loved" - GAB / Mother Teresa to MC, April 24, 1996 (pg 40, "Mother Teresa" by Brian Kolodiejchuk; Gonxhiu Agnes Bojaxhiu aka "Mother Teresa")

Catholic Theology has consistently taught that God made man freely and not out of any need or lack or want. God as God, DOES NOT THIRST, and DOES NOT HAVE A "NEED" TO LOVE OR TO BE LOVED. If God has needs, He isn't really absolutely and infinitely perfect and self-contained, and so he is not really God - Lucio Mascarenhas

"One very good thing was the fruit of my sickness... that the whole world prayed to the same God to make me well" - GAB / Mother Teresa to Roger Schultz Heresiarch at Taize Dec 16 1989, Summ. Doc. pg 455 (pg 311-2, "Mother Teresa" by Brian Kolodiejchuk; Gonxhiu Agnes Bojaxhiu aka "Mother Teresa")

The idea that "the whole world prayed to the same God to make me well" means either of two things and these only - either that all the world worships only one true God despite being in ignorance of that truth, or that, somehow, unbelievers mustered the will and piety to pray, not to their false gods, but to the true God for once. As a matter of fact, from the Catholic theological viewpoint, neither was true, and this is just another example of the profound impiety and malice of this woman! - Lucio Mascarenhas

"The Marian Society ladies have bought new clothes of 1212 Catholic children of the slums. To the Hindus we shall give in September during the Durga puja and the Muslims for Id" - GAB / Mother Teresa to Archbishop F. Perier, Dec 15, 1955 (pg 162-3, "Mother Teresa" by Brian Kolodiejchuk; Gonxhiu Agnes Bojaxhiu aka "Mother Teresa")

In the Bible, St. Paul the Apostle makes it very clear that Christians have an obligation not to allow unbelievers to think their false religions and gods to be true by the act of accepting and eating the foods "consecrated" to these "deities," even though St. Paul himself affirms that there is no power in these false "deities" and no real injury in eating such foods (He taught that Christians who are offered foodstuff without being told that they are "sacrificial foods" ought to eat them with a free conscience and do not need to ask if they are "sacrificial foods.") By that same principle, Christians have a strict obligation not to "felicitate" or facilitate the "festivals" of unbelievers, because these are impieties and wrong God. Christians can and must come to the aid of their neighbors, even unbelievers, but not by participation or even seeming to participate in their impious "religious festivals" - Lucio Mascarenhas

"The sick will be nursed as far as possible in their poor homes. The little children will have a school in the slums. The beggars will be sought and visited in their holes outside the town or on the streets" - GAB / Mother Teresa Rules for her MC (pg 43, "Mother Teresa" by Brian Kolodiejchuk; Gonxhiu Agnes Bojaxhiu aka "Mother Teresa")

Christianity has consistently taught that the poor, the sick, the destitute, the abandoned, etc. ought to be tended with the intention of rehabilitating them. Jesus Christ did not teach that the Samaritan ought to have tended to the wounds of the robbed man in situ and left there; Jesus applauded the fact that the Samaritan carried the robbed man to safety and arranged for his care. That is the Catholic ideal. The opposite ideal, that of GAB, is demonic! - Lucio Mascarenhas

WHY DID MOTHER TERESA HATE ME?

Posted by Lucio Mascarenhas, May 7, 2012
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/goancenter/conversations/messages/1723

?WAS MOTHER TERESA THE EPITOME OF COMPASSION? IF SO, WHY DID SHE HATE GOD SO VICIOUSLY, AND WHY DID SHE HATE ME, WHY DOES SHE HATE ME, AND EVERY SOUL, SO VICIOUSLY THAT SHE DESIRES TO PERVERT US AND BRING US DOWN TO HELL, TO ETERNAL DAMNATION? PRAY TELL ME....? — L甐 Mascarenhas "I've always said we should help a Hindu become a better Hindu, a Muslim become a better Muslim, a Catholic become a better Catholic" - Mother Teresa.

God says, "The gods of the pagans are devils," and "What the pagans sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils and not to God." He also says, "Touch not the unclean thing, but be thou separate, and I will be a Father unto you."

Either Mother Teresa is right and pious, and God is then necessarily evil, or God is Good and True, and then Mother Teresa is necessarily an Apostle of Satan!

"Some call Him Ishwar, some call Him Allah, some simply God, but we have to acknowledge that it is He who made us for greater things: to love and be loved. What matters is that we love. We cannot love without prayer, and so whatever religion we are, we must pray together" - Mother Teresa.

God says, "The gods of the pagans are devils," and "What the pagans sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils and not to God." He also says, "Touch not the unclean thing, but be thou separate, and I will be a Father unto you."

Either Mother Teresa is right and pious, and God is then necessarily evil, or God is Good and True, and then Mother Teresa is necessarily an Apostle of Satan!

"If in coming face to face with God we accept Him in our lives, then we are converting. We become a better Hindu, a better Muslim, a better Catholic, a better whatever we are.... What God is in your mind you must accept" (from Mother Teresa: Her People and Her Work by Desmond Doig, p. 156, as quoted by Dave Hunt, Global Peace and the Rise of Antichrist , p. 149).

God says, "The gods of the pagans are devils," and "What the pagans sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils and not to God." He also says, "Touch not the unclean thing, but be thou separate, and I will be a Father unto you."

Either Mother Teresa is right and pious, and God is then necessarily evil, or God is Good and True, and then Mother Teresa is necessarily an Apostle of Satan!

"I love all religions.... If people become better Hindus, better Muslims, better Buddhists by our acts of love, then there is something else growing there" AND "All is God - Buddhists, Hindus, Christians, etc., all have access to the same God" - Mother Teresa.

God says, "The gods of the pagans are devils," and "What the pagans sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils and not to God." He also says, "Touch not the unclean thing, but be thou separate, and I will be a Father unto you."

Either Mother Teresa is right and pious, and God is then necessarily evil, or God is Good and True, and then Mother Teresa is necessarily an Apostle of Satan!

"These people are waiting to die. What are you telling them to prepare them for death and eternity? We tell them to pray to their Bhagwan, to their gods" - Mother Teresa.

God says, "The gods of the pagans are devils," and "What the pagans sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils and not to God." He also says, "Touch not the unclean thing, but be thou separate, and I will be a Father unto you."

Either Mother Teresa is right and pious, and God is then necessarily evil, or God is Good and True, and then Mother Teresa is necessarily an Apostle of Satan!

"Mother Teresa also participated in the 'Summit for Peace' in Assisi, Italy, in November 1986, a prayer meeting was arranged by Antipope John-Paul II and attended by leaders of many different religions, including Hindu, Buddhist, Islamic, Shinto, Sikh, and North American Indian - all of whom united in prayers for world peace" (Time magazine, November 10 1986, pp. 78-79).

God says, "The gods of the pagans are devils," and "What the pagans sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils and not to God." He also says, "Touch not the unclean thing, but be thou separate, and I will be a Father unto you."

Either Mother Teresa is right and pious, and God is then necessarily evil, or God is Good and True, and then Mother Teresa is necessarily an Apostle of Satan!

"The following is from an interview with a Sister Ann belonging to Mother Teresa's Missionaries of Charity congregation at 11/23/84 at the Pashupati Temple, Kathmandu, Nepal, on November 23 1984: 'Do you believe if they die believing in Shiva or in Ram they will go to heaven?' 'Yes, that is their faith. My own faith will lead me to God.... So if they have believed in their god very strongly, if they have faith, surely they will be saved.'

'Today it does not seem that the Catholic Church is trying to convert anymore. I know that John Paul II is saying now that those of other religions are saved. You do not believe they are lost anyway, right?' 'No, they are not lost. They are saved according to their faith, you know. If they believe whatever they believe, that is their salvation'"

God says, "The gods of the pagans are devils," and "What the pagans sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils and not to God." He also says, "Touch not the unclean thing, but be thou separate, and I will be a Father unto you."

Either Mother Teresa is right and pious, and God is then necessarily evil, or God is Good and True, and then Mother Teresa is necessarily an Apostle of Satan!

References:
1. http://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/a013htMotherTeresa.htm
2. http://www.scionofzion.com/teresa.htm

The Satanism of Mother Teresa

Posted by Lucio Mascarenhas, May 7, 2012
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/goancenter/conversations/topics/1724

Mother Teresa led people in an Anglican Church, St. James at Piccadilly, London, June 1981, praying a Hindu prayer from the Upanishads.... We read, "'Lead me from death to life, from falsehood to truth; lead me from despair to hope, from fear to trust; lead me from hate to love, from war to peace. Let peace fill our heart, our world, our universe.'

Although it has also been credited as an adaptation by the Hindu Swami Chidananda Saraswati, it is a well known adaptation of the famous mantra from the Hindu Upanishads by Satish Kumar, a former Jain monk. The prayer was first publicly used in July 1981 by Mother Teresa in the Anglican Church, St. James', Piccadilly in London" (Source: http://liturgy.co.nz/reflection/peace.html)

The Catholic Church has always strictly forbidden participation in foreign liturgies, called the Crime of Communicatio in Sacris: Participation in the liturgies of heretics and unbelievers, of pagans and of infidels, on the pain of Automatic Excommunication 'latæ sententiæ' or without the need of a juridicial decree of excommunication. (See latinmassmagazine.com/articles/articles_2006_AC_Allan.html.)

The Apostate Vatican II sect has 'removed' this prohibition for itself. In EWTN's reply here, we see this new "Theology of Satanism" in practice:
ewtn.com/vexperts/

E. M. Moriarty on 12/14/2006: "There is a lovely Anglican church near my office and often I go there during lunch. I just sit there and look at the stained glass, read a spiritual book, pray, and enjoy the quiet. Is there anything in Canon Law forbidding my doing this? I have never participated in any of their liturgies and I have never attended vespers there, just used the church as a place of prayer and reflection."

Answer by "Fr" Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 12/15/2006: "I don't see a problem in canon law with what you are describing. Of course, if you went to a Catholic church, you might not have as pretty a surrounding (depending on the building), but you would have the Real Presence of the Lord Jesus in the tabernacle."

L甐 Mascarenhas

Monday, October 20, 2014

Morrisonian Satanism, yet again!

Morrisonian Satanism - Direct Promotion of Protestant Acephalism or "Headlessness"

The Catholic Church is centered, besides on God, on the Pope, the Successor of Peter in the Vicarship of Christ. Christ positively stated that He made Peter (and his successors) the Commander-in-Chief and Helmsman of all His Church on Earth. The Pope is central to Christianity. It is through the Pope that God works, guiding and ruling the Church, preserving its unity. God being Omnipotent, could have done it otherwise, but He did it this way. No man has the authority to abrogate that fundamental constitution of God's Church as He set it up - under the necessary supreme government of the lawful Catholic Pope, the Vicar of Christ.

Some "Sedevacantists" say that the Church is capable of surviving a long period without having a true, valid, lawful & Catholic Pope. It is God's positive will that the Church Militant always have a Head, the Pope, through whom He works. God can, and has, at times, allowed the Church to be deprived of a true, valid, lawful & Catholic Pope, but that is part of God's Permissive Will, not of His Positive Will.

The error opposed to this fundamental truth is Acephalism, the rejection of having a head lawfully appointed by God, an error that is critically contrary to Catholicism. Protestantism is Acephalist. Most sects in the history of Christianity have been Acephalous.

Traditio's "Fr." Morrison's Acephalist heresy directly contradicts the Holy & Ecumenical Council of the Vatican, 1869-1870:

"Therefore, if anyone says that it is not by the institution of Christ the Lord Himself (that is to say, by divine law) that blessed Peter should have perpetual successors in the primacy over the whole Church; or that the Roman Pontiff is not the successor of blessed Peter in this primacy: let him be accursed" (Vatican Council, Fourth Session, First Dogmatic Constitution on the Church of Christ, 2,5, On The Permanence of the Primacy of Blessed Peter in the Roman Pontiff, July 18th, 1870 A.D.)

To answer the heresiarch Morrison the Protestant & Pseudo-Traditionalist Catholic: The Catholic Church DOES depend upon the pope. It DOES matter who the pope is.

If it doesn't matter who the Pope is, Pope Boniface VIII's law Unam Sanctam would be meaningless, made void:

"Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff."

Morrison & his Traditio.com also tell lies about Antipope John XXIII-II Roncalli. It is a fact that Roncalli was a heretic both before his invalid election and remained so after, never changing, and leading souls astray deliberately, even going so far as to sacrifice his life by delaying medical treatment in order to ensure that his Robber Council wasn't hijacked by the Catholics. (See http://www.geocities.ws/prakashjm45/roncalli.html)

Morrison is very clever at quoting from Scriptures and Church teaching in order to distort the truth and mislead souls. It is true that Holy Bible teaches that "it is better to trust God than princes," but what he neglects to add is that it is God Himself Who set up the Papacy and who uses the Papacy to govern and guide His Church.

Morrison's "solution," the heresy of Acephalism, is Protestantism pure and unadulterated, and violently sins against God.

Morrison is an all round liar, hater of Catholicism and vicious Protestant, regurgitating Protestant lies incessantly.

Such, for example is this:

"The occasion... was the bicentennial of the restoration of the Society of Jesus, commonly known as the Jesuits. The Jesuits had become so corrupted by and immersed in secular politics by 1773 that even the pope couldn't tolerate them any longer. Pope Clement XIV suppressed the order in June 8, 1773, by his Brief of Abolition entitled Dominus ac Redemptor. The Society remained abolished for 41 years. Since the Modernist Vatican II Council (1962-1965), Newchurch Society of Jesus has become even more anti-Catholic and politicized, to the point of embracing Marxist 'Liberation Theology.'"

As a matter of fact, the Popes were forced and blackmailed by antiCatholics to suppress the Jesuits as the most powerful self-defensive tool of the Church, and as soon as the power of the Satanists was broken, the Popes hastened to restore the Jesuit order, in sharp contrast to the Templars, who were never reinstated.

The Catholic perspective on this issue is given by these pages: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14096a.htm & http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14103a.htm.

Morrison is also fond of pretending that Pope Pius IX wasn't in favor of the formalization of the Dogma of Papal Infallibility. As an outspoken Pope, Pius IX never made any such statement. Morrison is only distorting facts to promote Protestantism, as usual.

SUMMARY: The Vatican Council 1869-1870 clear states that those who deny its teachings are accursed, anathema. Morrison has repeatedly drawn this Anathema upon himself by directly contradicting the Holy Council, the Words of the Holy Ghost. He is, therefore, a man who is self-damned.

Lucio Mascarenhas

Morrison's Acephalist Satanism

Source: http://www.traditio.com/comment/com1410.htm October 21, 2014 - St. Hilarius, Abbot

A Reader Asks: "How Is a Traditional Pope to Be Elected Now? Does It Matter in the End Who the Pope Is?"

From: Greg

All Too Much Emphasis Has Been Placed since Vatican II on the Pope. Until The Mid Twentieth Century, most Catholics Did Not even Know Who the Pope Was. Whoever He Was, He Couldn't Change The Mass, The Sacraments, Catholic Doctrine, Or Catholic Morality. There Are a Number of Pseudo-Traditionalists around These Days who Think that if Only the Right Pope Were Elected, All Will Be Well. No Pope Can Solve the Nadir into Which The Church Has Sunk. Now Only God Can.

Dear TRADITIO Fathers:

With the corruption of the institutional organization since the Vatican II Council (1962-1965), how is a traditional pope to be elected now? The majority of churchmen have become corrupt and have abandoned the Catholic Faith. How is a traditional pope going to be elected to restore order in the Church? It seems as though the corruption is accelerating with the Synod of the Family that is now taking place. Does it matter in the end who the pope is?

The TRADITIO Fathers Reply:

All too much emphasis has been placed since the Modernist Vatican II Council on the person of the pope. Until the mid-twentieth century, most Catholics did not even know who the pope was. Whoever he was, he had no authority to change the Mass, the Sacraments, Catholic doctrine, or Catholic morality. One pope died, another was elected, and nothing would change. Nothing could change.

The Catholic Church does not depend upon the pope. It should not even matter who the pope is. There have been almost three hundred times in the history of the Church when there was no pope, extending from a period of days to a period of years. This is in accordance with the decree of the dogmatic Vatican I Council in its Constitutio Dogmatica Prima de Ecclesia Christi (Pastor Aeternus), cap. IV, De Romani Pontificis Infallibili Magisterio, of July 18, 1870:

Neque enim Petri successoribus Spiritus sanctus promissus est, ut eo revelante novam doctrinam patefacerent, sed ut eo assistente traditam per apostolos revelationem seu fidei depositum sancte custodirent et fideliter exponerent.

For the Holy Ghost was promised to the successors of Peter not so that they might, by His revelation, make known some new doctrine, but that, by His assistance, they might religiously guard and faithfully expound the revelation or Deposit of Faith transmitted by the Apostles.

All that changed after the Modernist Vatican II Council came along and started the substitution of the Catholic Church by the Newchurch of the New Order, which is not the Catholic Church any more than the Anglican Synod is. This is not what John XXIII had intended with the Council that he had convoked. Contrary to the propaganda that you read in the uninformed religious and secular press, John XXIII was actually quite traditional. He wanted no change in the Mass. He wanted no change in the Sacraments. He wanted no change in Catholic theology. He wanted no change in Catholic morality. He simply wanted the bishops to get together in the century after Vatican I and discuss some practical issues. John XXIII never signed a single document of the Council. On his deathbed, according to a peritus who was there, John XXIII repeated: "Stop the Council. Stop the Council."

It was through the connivance of John XXIII's successor, Paul VI-Montini, and his henchman, the Freemason presbyter Hannibal Bugnini, that by 1969 in Newrome the Catholic Church was replaced by the Newchurch of the New Order. The Catholic Mass was suppressed; a Protestantized invalid "New Mess" was substituted. The Sacrament of Holy Orders was suppressed, so that Catholic priests were no longer ordained nor Catholic bishops consecrated, but presbyters and Newbishops were merely "installed to preside over the assembly of the people."

There are a number of pseudo-traditionalists around these days who want to play God. They want to hold some phony council, declare some phony pope. They think that if only the right pope were elected, all will be well. They are gravely mistaken, and they are not Catholic in their minds. No pope can solve the nadir into which the Church has sunk in the Modernist period. Only God can. Of this fact, we are reminded in the Scriptures:

Bonum est confidere in Domino, quam confidere in homine. Bonum est sperare in Domino quam sperare in principibus.

It is good to confide in the Lord, rather than to have confidence in man. It is good to trust in the Lord, rather than to trust in princes (Psalm 117:8/DRV). And again:

Nolite confidere in principibus.

Put not your trust in princes (Psalms 145:2/DRV).

So, what are we to do? Scripture gives us the answer. It is the same answer that St. Paul gave to the Thessalonians of his time:

State et tenete traditiones, quas didicistis sive per semonem sive per epistulam nostram.

Therefore, brethren, stand fast: and hold the traditions that you have learned, whether by word or by our epistle (2 Thessalonians 2:14/DRV).

Thus, Scripture tells us that it is our responsibility to hold to the Traditions that we were taught. The rest is God's business. It is his Church. He will do with it as He pleases, when He pleases. Any correction may take a decade, a century, or even until the Second Coming. If only we had followed St. Paul's command, starting around the 1960s, the Church would not be in the sad state in which it finds itself today. Instead, most of those who called themselves "Catholics" then rejected the truths of the Bible and rejected the Catholic and Apostolic Tradition and instead, to their infamy, were all too ready to embrace an unCatholic New Order sect, with its invalid and unCatholic Mess and "Sacraments."

Good Catholics, we need to have trust in God and let Him do His work as He pleases. We, on the other hand, need to do our work of standing by Scripture and Tradition. If we do this, the situation will be corrected in due time, whether years, decades, or centuries. If we do not do this, the Church has not a prayer of correcting itself.

Frances "Who Am I to Judge" judges Catholics 'evil,' Sodomites 'precious'!

ArchPharisee Frances says 'he' can't judge homosexuals. Yet he is not unable to also judge Catholics, viciously badwording them as 'Pelagians,' etc. And he is also able to judge that Sodomites, whom God insistently holds as accursed in the Bible, are rather bearers of precious, goodly, godly gifts necessary for the Christian Church! What can be more hypocritical than this?

Tuesday, October 7, 2014

Cataclysmic Split Looms for Roman Lutheranism / Vatican II sect: St Tomassucio's Prophecy Being Realized?

I have important info you may want to look up: Threats of 2 way split in Vatican II "Catholic" sect looms with ongoing "Extraordinary Synod" in Rome.

BASIC PREMISES:

YEARS AGO, after studying the issue carefully, collating all the relevant information, rules and facts, I had summarized Fr Felix Sarda y Salvany & Pope St. Pius X's denunciation & excommunication of the Modernist Protestant infiltrators by distinguishing them into two main and usually mutually antagonistic factions, the Gradualists such as Antipope John-Paul II, who sought to avoid rocking the boat by acts that shocked and who sought to bring about a slow and careful conversion of Catholics to Modernist Protestantism, and the Celerists or Rapidists, those who sought a rapid, instant changeover from Catholicism to Modernist Protestantism. They both seek the same end, but by different means that set them against each other. Just as Jacobins and Girondists fought each other in the French Revolution. Francis and the Rapidists / Celerists are the Trotskyites to the Ratzingerite Stalinists.

That this has gone beyond gnashings of teeth and furtive whispers and mutterings to the actual marshalling towards positive acts of resistance has been recognized by Antipope Bergoglio himself, denouncing the resistance of some of his "bishops."

http://www.deccanchronicle.com/141006/world-middle-east/article/pope-opens-synod-call-bishops-stop-fighting; http://ncronline.org/news/vatican/pope-opens-synod-criticizing-bad-shepherds-those-who-thwart-god; http://www.npr.org/2014/10/05/353839373/vatican-synod-tests-the-popes-vision-of-a-more-merciful-church

See also: http://www.geocities.ws/prakashjm45/rmc/repairmychurch.html & http://www.geocities.ws/prakashjm45/rmc/repairmychurch2.html

POSITION: Fr Kelly Bowring's explosive challenge to "pope" Francis I: http://twoheartspress.com/blog/open-letter-to-pope-francis-are-you-planning-to-redefine-church-doctrine/

CONTRA: http://novusordowatch.org/wire/how-long-until-schism.htm

There's more: Cardinals, bishops, priests, journalists specializing on Catholicism have taken public stands against the "orientation" Francis seeks to give his sect.

Italian journalist Antonio Socci says Antipope Benedict XVI Ratzinger's "resignation" invalid, denies "validity" of Antipope Francis I Bergoglio:

POSITION: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/11/antonio-socci-pope-benedict_n_2662677.html

CONTRA: http://www.novusordowatch.org/wire/socci-resignation-invalid.htm

Italians petition rejects Francis as "not a true pope" ("non e un vero papa") and demands he go away: http://www.petizioni24.com/dimissioni_per_papa_francesco_bergoglio_non_e_un_vero_papa

ALSO: http://www.independent.ie/world-news/europe/pope-braced-for-a-bruising-showdown-with-hardliners-30637516.html

Leo "Cardinal" Burke (who has become one of the lightening rods of the Anti-Bergoglian faction) said, “I find it amazing that 'Cardinal' Kasper claims to speak for (Antipope) Francis I. Francis does not have laryngitis. He is not mute. He can speak for himself.”

More from Burke: http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/we-have-to-judge-acts-vaticans-cardinal-burke-dismantles-who-am-i-to-judge & Malta Exile, Demotion for Burke

Fr Paul Kramer: http://www.novusordowatch.org/wire/paul-kramer-rejects-francis.htm, http://www.novusordowatch.org/wire/kramer-resignationists.htm